Abstract: Dose–response curves for acetochlor with and without timely rotary hoeing (two passes) were derived for corn (Zea mays) fields over 2 yr. The fields were dominated by green foxtail (Setaria viridis), which constituted 73 to 86% of the weed vegetation, but also contained minor populations of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). In the absence of herbicide, rotary hoeing achieved about 50% weed control. In the absence of rotary hoeing, weed control averaged > 90% at the full label rate of acetochlor (3 kg ai/ha on clay loam soil). With two timely rotary hoeings, however, this same level of control was achieved with only 1 kg/ha acetochlor. Given the suite of weed species present in these experiments, timely rotary hoeing substituted for 67% of the label rate of acetochlor. Timeliness of rotary hoeing operations also provided consistency of results from one year to the next.
Nomenclature: Acetochlor, 2-chloro-N-(ethoxymethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)acetamide; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVI; Pennsylvania smartweed, Polygonum pensylvanicum (L.) # POLPY; redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L.; corn, Zea mays L.
Additional index words: Integrated weed management, interrow cultivation, preemergence herbicide, seedling emergence, timeliness.
